Concept Mapping

TABS (Complex) view — All 57 survey items with section-grouped panels, scale visualizations, citation tools, and cross-reference linking.

57 of 57 items
A1Categorical (Nominal)

What is your primary C-suite role (or equivalent senior leadership role in a government/public sector organization) within the organization? (Select one)

Section / Primary Construct
Section A: Demographics
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Role & Organization Demographics
Measurement Objective
Respondent's senior leadership position and functional area.
Item Code / Variable Name
A1 / Demo_Role
Variable Type
Categorical (Nominal)
Theoretical Grounding
N/A (Demographic)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
Categorical (11 options): CEO (e.g., Agency Director, Secretary, Administrator, City/County Manager); CFO (e.g., Director of Finance, Budget Director, Comptroller); CIO (e.g., Director of IT); CISO (e.g., Director of Cybersecurity, Chief Security Officer); COO (e.g., Deputy Director, Chief of Staff, Assistant Secretary for Administration); CMO (e.g., Director of Communications, Public Affairs Officer, Chief Marketing & Communications Officer); CTO (e.g., Director of Technology/Innovation, Chief Scientist); CSO (e.g., Director of Strategic Planning, Policy Director, Chief Strategy Officer); CHRO (e.g., Chief Human Capital Officer (CHCO), Director of Human Resources, Personnel Director); CRO (e.g., Director of Budget/Finance, Director of Development/Fundraising, Head of Revenue Operations); Other (please specify)
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID205 / Q1_Role
Relationship to Other Items
—
A1bCategorical (Ordinal)

How would you describe your level of involvement in strategic technology adoption decisions at your organization?

Section / Primary Construct
Section A: Demographics
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Role & Organization Demographics
Measurement Objective
Respondent's level of involvement in strategic technology adoption decisions.
Item Code / Variable Name
A1b / Demo_DecisionAuth
Variable Type
Categorical (Ordinal)
Theoretical Grounding
N/A (Demographic)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
Categorical (5 options): I am the primary decision-maker for technology adoption in my area of responsibility; I am one of several key decision-makers who collectively decide on technology adoption; I provide significant input and recommendations, but final decisions are made by others; I have limited involvement — I primarily implement technology decisions made by leadership; I have no direct involvement in technology adoption decisions
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID237 / Q2_DecisionAuth
Relationship to Other Items
—
A2Categorical (Nominal)

What is the primary industry of your organization?

Section / Primary Construct
Section A: Demographics
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Role & Organization Demographics
Measurement Objective
Primary industry sector of the organization.
Item Code / Variable Name
A2 / Demo_Industry
Variable Type
Categorical (Nominal)
Theoretical Grounding
N/A (Demographic)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
Categorical (26 options): Federal Government/Defense; State Government; Local Government (City/County/Municipality); Public Education (K-12/Higher Ed); Non-Profit Organization (Non-Governmental); Public Healthcare; Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting; Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction; Utilities; Construction; Manufacturing; Wholesale Trade; Retail Trade; Transportation and Warehousing; Information; Finance and Insurance; Real Estate and Rental and Leasing; Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services; Management of Companies and Enterprises; Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services; Educational Services (Private); Health Care and Social Assistance (Private); Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation; Accommodation and Food Services; Other Services (except Public Administration); Other (please specify)
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID206 / Q3_Industry
Relationship to Other Items
—
A3Categorical (Ordinal)

What is the approximate number of employees in your organization globally?

Section / Primary Construct
Section A: Demographics
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Role & Organization Demographics
Measurement Objective
Organization size by global employee count.
Item Code / Variable Name
A3 / Demo_OrgSize_Employees
Variable Type
Categorical (Ordinal)
Theoretical Grounding
N/A (Demographic)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
Categorical (6 options): <100; 100-499; 500-999; 1000-4999; 5000-9999; 10000+
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID207 / Q4_OrgSize
Relationship to Other Items
—
A4Categorical (Nominal)

What is your organization's primary profit model?

Section / Primary Construct
Section A: Demographics
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Role & Organization Demographics
Measurement Objective
For-Profit, Non-Profit, or Government/Public Sector classification.
Item Code / Variable Name
A4 / Demo_ProfitModel
Variable Type
Categorical (Nominal)
Theoretical Grounding
N/A (Demographic)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
Categorical (3 options): For-Profit; Non-Profit; Government/Public Sector
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID208 / Q5_ProfitModel
Relationship to Other Items
—
A5Categorical (Ordinal)

What was your organization's approximate annual revenue (or annual operating budget for government/public sector) in the last fiscal year?

Section / Primary Construct
Section A: Demographics
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Role & Organization Demographics
Measurement Objective
Annual revenue or operating budget range.
Item Code / Variable Name
A5 / Demo_AnnualRevenue_Budget
Variable Type
Categorical (Ordinal)
Theoretical Grounding
N/A (Demographic)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
Categorical (6 options): <$10M; $10M-$49M; $50M-$99M; $100M-$499M; $500M-$999M; $1B+
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID209 / Q6_RevenueBudget
Relationship to Other Items
—
A6Categorical (Ordinal)

What was your personal area of responsibilities approximate annual operating budget in the last fiscal year?

Section / Primary Construct
Section A: Demographics
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Role & Organization Demographics
Measurement Objective
Respondent's personal area operating budget range.
Item Code / Variable Name
A6 / Demo_PersonalBudget
Variable Type
Categorical (Ordinal)
Theoretical Grounding
N/A (Demographic)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
Categorical (6 options): <$10M; $10M-$49M; $50M-$99M; $100M-$499M; $500M-$999M; $1B+
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID231 / Q7_PersonalBudget
Relationship to Other Items
—
A7Categorical (Nominal)

What is your organization's primary geographic area of operations?

Section / Primary Construct
Section A: Demographics
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Role & Organization Demographics
Measurement Objective
Primary geographic area of operations (U.S. vs. International).
Item Code / Variable Name
A7 / Demo_GeoArea
Variable Type
Categorical (Nominal)
Theoretical Grounding
N/A (Demographic)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
Categorical (2 options): United States; International
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID210 / Q8_GeoScope
Relationship to Other Items
—
A8Categorical (Ordinal)

What is your organization's primary geographic scale of operations?

Section / Primary Construct
Section A: Demographics
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Role & Organization Demographics
Measurement Objective
Geographic scale of operations (Local to International).
Item Code / Variable Name
A8 / Demo_GeoScale
Variable Type
Categorical (Ordinal)
Theoretical Grounding
N/A (Demographic)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
Categorical (4 options): Local; Regional; National; International
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID232 / Q9_GeoScale
Relationship to Other Items
—
B1Ordinal (Likert-type)

Resistance to change among employees or middle management.

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Organizational & Cultural Resistance
Measurement Objective
Severity of employee/middle management resistance to adopting new technologies.
Item Code / Variable Name
B1 / Barrier_ResistChangeEmp
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Kotter (1995); Tornatzky & Fleischer (1990)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Barrier Severity: Not a Barrier; Minor Barrier; Moderate Barrier; Significant Barrier; Major Barrier + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_1
Relationship to Other Items
maps to B1
B2Ordinal (Likert-type)

Lack of support or clear vision from top leadership (including the board, e.g., governing body, oversight committee).

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Strategic & Operational Challenges
Measurement Objective
Severity of lack of top leadership support or clear technology vision.
Item Code / Variable Name
B2 / Barrier_LackLeadershipSupport
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Kotter (1995); Jeyaraj et al. (2006)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Barrier Severity: Not a Barrier; Minor Barrier; Moderate Barrier; Significant Barrier; Major Barrier + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_2
Relationship to Other Items
maps to B2
B3Ordinal (Likert-type)

Organizational culture that discourages risk-taking or experimentation with new technologies.

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Organizational & Cultural Resistance
Measurement Objective
Severity of risk-averse organizational culture as a technology adoption barrier.
Item Code / Variable Name
B3 / Barrier_CultureRiskAverse
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Hofstede (1980); Cameron & Quinn (2006)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Barrier Severity: Not a Barrier; Minor Barrier; Moderate Barrier; Significant Barrier; Major Barrier + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_3
Relationship to Other Items
maps to B3
B4Ordinal (Likert-type)

Insufficient skills or expertise within the workforce to utilize new technologies effectively.

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Resource & Skill Deficiencies
Measurement Objective
Severity of workforce skills/expertise gap for utilizing new technologies.
Item Code / Variable Name
B4 / Barrier_LackSkillsExpertise
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Davis (1989); Venkatesh et al. (2003)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Barrier Severity: Not a Barrier; Minor Barrier; Moderate Barrier; Significant Barrier; Major Barrier + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_4
Relationship to Other Items
maps to B4
B5Ordinal (Likert-type)

Inadequate training programs for new technologies.

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Resource & Skill Deficiencies
Measurement Objective
Severity of inadequate technology training programs as a barrier.
Item Code / Variable Name
B5 / Barrier_InadequateTraining
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Rogers (2003); Venkatesh et al. (2003)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Barrier Severity: Not a Barrier; Minor Barrier; Moderate Barrier; Significant Barrier; Major Barrier + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_5
Relationship to Other Items
maps to B5
B6Ordinal (Likert-type)

High cost associated with acquiring or implementing new technologies.

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Resource & Skill Deficiencies
Measurement Objective
Severity of high costs associated with technology acquisition and implementation.
Item Code / Variable Name
B6 / Barrier_HighCost
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Tornatzky & Fleischer (1990); Zhu et al. (2006)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Barrier Severity: Not a Barrier; Minor Barrier; Moderate Barrier; Significant Barrier; Major Barrier + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_6
Relationship to Other Items
maps to B6
B7Ordinal (Likert-type)

Difficulty integrating new technologies with existing legacy systems.

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Strategic & Operational Challenges
Measurement Objective
Severity of legacy system integration challenges.
Item Code / Variable Name
B7 / Barrier_IntegrationDiff
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Ross et al. (2006); Weill & Ross (2004)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Barrier Severity: Not a Barrier; Minor Barrier; Moderate Barrier; Significant Barrier; Major Barrier + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_7
Relationship to Other Items
maps to B7
B8Ordinal (Likert-type)

Inadequate IT infrastructure (e.g., network, storage, computing power) to support new technologies.

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Resource & Skill Deficiencies
Measurement Objective
Severity of inadequate IT infrastructure (network, storage, computing) as a barrier.
Item Code / Variable Name
B8 / Barrier_InadequateInfra
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Weill & Ross (2004); Zhu et al. (2006)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Barrier Severity: Not a Barrier; Minor Barrier; Moderate Barrier; Significant Barrier; Major Barrier + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_8
Relationship to Other Items
maps to B8
B9Ordinal (Likert-type)

Difficulty demonstrating clear value (e.g., mission impact, public value, cost-effectiveness) for new technology investments.

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Strategic & Operational Challenges
Measurement Objective
Severity of difficulty demonstrating clear value for technology investments.
Item Code / Variable Name
B9 / Barrier_ValueDemoDiff
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
DeLone & McLean (2003); Brynjolfsson (1993)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Barrier Severity: Not a Barrier; Minor Barrier; Moderate Barrier; Significant Barrier; Major Barrier + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_9
Relationship to Other Items
maps to B9
B10Ordinal (Likert-type)

Lack of a clear strategy or roadmap for technology adoption.

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Strategic & Operational Challenges
Measurement Objective
Severity of lacking a clear technology adoption strategy or roadmap.
Item Code / Variable Name
B10 / Barrier_LackStrategy
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Henderson & Venkatraman (1993); Ross et al. (2006)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Barrier Severity: Not a Barrier; Minor Barrier; Moderate Barrier; Significant Barrier; Major Barrier + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_10
Relationship to Other Items
maps to B10
B11Ordinal (Likert-type)

Insufficient governance processes for selecting and managing new technologies.

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Strategic & Operational Challenges
Measurement Objective
Severity of insufficient technology governance processes.
Item Code / Variable Name
B11 / Barrier_LackGovernance
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Weill & Ross (2004); COBIT (ISACA)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Barrier Severity: Not a Barrier; Minor Barrier; Moderate Barrier; Significant Barrier; Major Barrier + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_11
Relationship to Other Items
maps to B11
B12Ordinal (Likert-type)

New technologies disrupting existing workflows or processes significantly.

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Strategic & Operational Challenges
Measurement Objective
Severity of workflow/process disruption from new technology adoption.
Item Code / Variable Name
B12 / Barrier_WorkflowDisrupt
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Davenport (1993); Hammer & Champy (1993)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Barrier Severity: Not a Barrier; Minor Barrier; Moderate Barrier; Significant Barrier; Major Barrier + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_12
Relationship to Other Items
maps to B12
B13Ordinal (Likert-type)

Concerns about cybersecurity risks associated with new technologies.

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Risk, Trust, & External Factors
Measurement Objective
Severity of cybersecurity risk concerns as a technology adoption barrier.
Item Code / Variable Name
B13 / Barrier_CyberRisk
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
NIST CSF; ISO 27001
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Barrier Severity: Not a Barrier; Minor Barrier; Moderate Barrier; Significant Barrier; Major Barrier + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_13
Relationship to Other Items
maps to B13
B14Ordinal (Likert-type)

Concerns about data privacy compliance related to new technologies.

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Risk, Trust, & External Factors
Measurement Objective
Severity of data privacy compliance concerns as a technology adoption barrier.
Item Code / Variable Name
B14 / Barrier_PrivacyRisk
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
GDPR frameworks; NIST Privacy Framework
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Barrier Severity: Not a Barrier; Minor Barrier; Moderate Barrier; Significant Barrier; Major Barrier + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_14
Relationship to Other Items
maps to B14
B15Ordinal (Likert-type)

Lack of trust in the reliability or performance of new technologies or vendors.

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Risk, Trust, & External Factors
Measurement Objective
Severity of lack of trust in technology/vendor reliability.
Item Code / Variable Name
B15 / Barrier_LackTrustTechVendor
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Mayer et al. (1995); Gefen et al. (2003)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Barrier Severity: Not a Barrier; Minor Barrier; Moderate Barrier; Significant Barrier; Major Barrier + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_15
Relationship to Other Items
maps to B15
B16Ordinal (Likert-type)

Uncertainty or complexity related to regulatory requirements.

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Risk, Trust, & External Factors
Measurement Objective
Severity of regulatory uncertainty or complexity as a barrier.
Item Code / Variable Name
B16 / Barrier_RegulatoryUncertain
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
North (1990); Blind (2012)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Barrier Severity: Not a Barrier; Minor Barrier; Moderate Barrier; Significant Barrier; Major Barrier + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_16
Relationship to Other Items
maps to B16
B17Ordinal (Likert-type)

Pressure to adopt technology due to external factors (e.g., mandates, public expectations, peer agency actions), without adequate internal readiness.

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Risk, Trust, & External Factors
Measurement Objective
Severity of external pressures to adopt technology without adequate readiness.
Item Code / Variable Name
B17 / Barrier_ExternalPressure
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
DiMaggio & Powell (1983); Scott (2001)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Barrier Severity: Not a Barrier; Minor Barrier; Moderate Barrier; Significant Barrier; Major Barrier + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_17
Relationship to Other Items
maps to B17
B18Ordinal (Likert-type)

Difficulty finding reliable technology vendors or partners.

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Risk, Trust, & External Factors
Measurement Objective
Severity of difficulty finding reliable technology vendors or partners.
Item Code / Variable Name
B18 / Barrier_VendorDiff
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Lacity & Willcocks (2012)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Barrier Severity: Not a Barrier; Minor Barrier; Moderate Barrier; Significant Barrier; Major Barrier + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_18
Relationship to Other Items
maps to B18
B_Top3Categorical (Nominal - multi-select)

Of all the barriers listed above, which THREE are the most significant barriers your organization currently faces? (Select exactly 3)

Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Perceived Technology Adoption Barriers
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Top 3 Barrier Selection
Measurement Objective
Identify top 3 most significant barriers via forced-choice selection from all 18 barrier items.
Item Code / Variable Name
B_Top3 / Barrier_Top3Select
Variable Type
Categorical (Nominal - multi-select)
Theoretical Grounding
Integrated TABS Framework (Moyer, 2025)
APA Citation
Moyer, C. (2025). Technology Adoption Barriers Survey (TABS) framework.
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
Select exactly 3 of 18 barrier items (randomized presentation order)
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID238 / Q29-46_Top3Barriers
Relationship to Other Items
Follows barrier severity rating (QID213); replaces removed Q9/Q10 rank-order questions
B_ACOrdinal (Likert-type)⚠ Attention Check

The degree to which internal communication gaps slow adoption efforts (select Major Barrier for this item).

Expected answer: Major Barrier
Section / Primary Construct
Section B: Attention Check
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Data Quality Control
Measurement Objective
Attention/validity check embedded in barrier severity matrix (instructed-response item).
Item Code / Variable Name
B_AC / Barrier_AttentionCheck
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Survey methodology best practice (IRI)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
Major Barrier
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID213 / Q10-28_Barriers_19
Relationship to Other Items
Attention check item; expected response: Major Barrier (instructed-response item)
C1Ordinal (Likert-type)

Clarity and communication of the leadership's vision for technology adoption and digital transformation.

Section / Primary Construct
Section C: Perceived Organizational Technology Readiness
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Strategic Leadership & Governance
Measurement Objective
Readiness: clarity/communication of leadership's technology vision.
Item Code / Variable Name
C1 / Ready_LeaderVisionClarity
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Kotter (1995); Jeyaraj et al. (2006)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Readiness/Capability: Very Low Readiness/Capability; Low Readiness/Capability; Moderate Readiness/Capability; High Readiness/Capability; Very High Readiness/Capability + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID217 / Q47-64_Readiness_1
Relationship to Other Items
—
C2Ordinal (Likert-type)

Alignment of technology strategy with overall organizational goals and mission objectives.

Section / Primary Construct
Section C: Perceived Organizational Technology Readiness
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Strategic Leadership & Governance
Measurement Objective
Readiness: alignment of technology strategy with organizational goals.
Item Code / Variable Name
C2 / Ready_StratAlign
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Henderson & Venkatraman (1993)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Readiness/Capability: Very Low Readiness/Capability; Low Readiness/Capability; Moderate Readiness/Capability; High Readiness/Capability; Very High Readiness/Capability + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID217 / Q47-64_Readiness_2
Relationship to Other Items
—
C3Ordinal (Likert-type)

Effectiveness of IT governance structures in guiding technology decisions and investments.

Section / Primary Construct
Section C: Perceived Organizational Technology Readiness
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Strategic Leadership & Governance
Measurement Objective
Readiness: effectiveness of IT governance structures.
Item Code / Variable Name
C3 / Ready_ITGovEffective
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Weill & Ross (2004); COBIT (ISACA)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Readiness/Capability: Very Low Readiness/Capability; Low Readiness/Capability; Moderate Readiness/Capability; High Readiness/Capability; Very High Readiness/Capability + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID217 / Q47-64_Readiness_3
Relationship to Other Items
—
C4Ordinal (Likert-type)

Openness of the organizational culture to embracing change and new ways of working.

Section / Primary Construct
Section C: Perceived Organizational Technology Readiness
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Culture & Change Readiness
Measurement Objective
Readiness: openness of organizational culture to change.
Item Code / Variable Name
C4 / Ready_CultureOpenness
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Hofstede (1980); Cameron & Quinn (2006)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Readiness/Capability: Very Low Readiness/Capability; Low Readiness/Capability; Moderate Readiness/Capability; High Readiness/Capability; Very High Readiness/Capability + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID217 / Q47-64_Readiness_4
Relationship to Other Items
—
C5Ordinal (Likert-type)

Extent to which innovation and experimentation with technology are encouraged and supported.

Section / Primary Construct
Section C: Perceived Organizational Technology Readiness
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Culture & Change Readiness
Measurement Objective
Readiness: extent innovation/experimentation is encouraged.
Item Code / Variable Name
C5 / Ready_InnovationSupport
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Christensen (1997); O'Reilly & Tushman (2004)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Readiness/Capability: Very Low Readiness/Capability; Low Readiness/Capability; Moderate Readiness/Capability; High Readiness/Capability; Very High Readiness/Capability + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID217 / Q47-64_Readiness_5
Relationship to Other Items
—
C6Ordinal (Likert-type)

Availability of personnel with the necessary technical skills to implement and manage new technologies.

Section / Primary Construct
Section C: Perceived Organizational Technology Readiness
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Workforce & Skills Readiness
Measurement Objective
Readiness: availability of technically skilled personnel.
Item Code / Variable Name
C6 / Ready_TechSkillsAvail
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Davis (1989); Venkatesh et al. (2003)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Readiness/Capability: Very Low Readiness/Capability; Low Readiness/Capability; Moderate Readiness/Capability; High Readiness/Capability; Very High Readiness/Capability + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID217 / Q47-64_Readiness_6
Relationship to Other Items
—
C7Ordinal (Likert-type)

Effectiveness of training programs in preparing employees for new technologies.

Section / Primary Construct
Section C: Perceived Organizational Technology Readiness
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Workforce & Skills Readiness
Measurement Objective
Readiness: effectiveness of technology training programs.
Item Code / Variable Name
C7 / Ready_TrainingEffective
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Rogers (2003); Venkatesh et al. (2003)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Readiness/Capability: Very Low Readiness/Capability; Low Readiness/Capability; Moderate Readiness/Capability; High Readiness/Capability; Very High Readiness/Capability + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID217 / Q47-64_Readiness_7
Relationship to Other Items
—
C8Ordinal (Likert-type)

Maturity of change management processes to support technology transitions.

Section / Primary Construct
Section C: Perceived Organizational Technology Readiness
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Culture & Change Readiness
Measurement Objective
Readiness: maturity of change management processes.
Item Code / Variable Name
C8 / Ready_ChangeMgtMaturity
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Kotter (1995); Prosci ADKAR
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Readiness/Capability: Very Low Readiness/Capability; Low Readiness/Capability; Moderate Readiness/Capability; High Readiness/Capability; Very High Readiness/Capability + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID217 / Q47-64_Readiness_8
Relationship to Other Items
—
C9Ordinal (Likert-type)

Adequacy and scalability of the current IT infrastructure (network, cloud, hardware).

Section / Primary Construct
Section C: Perceived Organizational Technology Readiness
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Infrastructure & Technology Readiness
Measurement Objective
Readiness: adequacy/scalability of IT infrastructure.
Item Code / Variable Name
C9 / Ready_InfraAdequacy
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Weill & Ross (2004); Zhu et al. (2006)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Readiness/Capability: Very Low Readiness/Capability; Low Readiness/Capability; Moderate Readiness/Capability; High Readiness/Capability; Very High Readiness/Capability + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID217 / Q47-64_Readiness_9
Relationship to Other Items
—
C10Ordinal (Likert-type)

Compatibility and interoperability between new technologies and existing systems.

Section / Primary Construct
Section C: Perceived Organizational Technology Readiness
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Infrastructure & Technology Readiness
Measurement Objective
Readiness: compatibility between new and existing systems.
Item Code / Variable Name
C10 / Ready_SystemCompat
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Ross et al. (2006); IEEE interoperability standards
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Readiness/Capability: Very Low Readiness/Capability; Low Readiness/Capability; Moderate Readiness/Capability; High Readiness/Capability; Very High Readiness/Capability + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID217 / Q47-64_Readiness_10
Relationship to Other Items
—
C11Ordinal (Likert-type)

Availability and responsiveness of technical support for technology users.

Section / Primary Construct
Section C: Perceived Organizational Technology Readiness
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Infrastructure & Technology Readiness
Measurement Objective
Readiness: availability/responsiveness of technical support.
Item Code / Variable Name
C11 / Ready_TechSupport
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
DeLone & McLean (2003)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Readiness/Capability: Very Low Readiness/Capability; Low Readiness/Capability; Moderate Readiness/Capability; High Readiness/Capability; Very High Readiness/Capability + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID217 / Q47-64_Readiness_11
Relationship to Other Items
—
C12Ordinal (Likert-type)

Maturity of data governance policies and practices.

Section / Primary Construct
Section C: Perceived Organizational Technology Readiness
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Data & Analytics Readiness
Measurement Objective
Readiness: maturity of data governance policies/practices.
Item Code / Variable Name
C12 / Ready_DataGovMaturity
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
DAMA-DMBOK; COBIT (ISACA)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Readiness/Capability: Very Low Readiness/Capability; Low Readiness/Capability; Moderate Readiness/Capability; High Readiness/Capability; Very High Readiness/Capability + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID217 / Q47-64_Readiness_12
Relationship to Other Items
—
C13Ordinal (Likert-type)

Overall quality and reliability of organizational data used for decision-making and AI/ML models.

Section / Primary Construct
Section C: Perceived Organizational Technology Readiness
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Data & Analytics Readiness
Measurement Objective
Readiness: quality/reliability of organizational data.
Item Code / Variable Name
C13 / Ready_DataQuality
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Wang & Strong (1996); DAMA-DMBOK
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Readiness/Capability: Very Low Readiness/Capability; Low Readiness/Capability; Moderate Readiness/Capability; High Readiness/Capability; Very High Readiness/Capability + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID217 / Q47-64_Readiness_13
Relationship to Other Items
—
C14Ordinal (Likert-type)

Organization's capability in data analytics and leveraging data for insights.

Section / Primary Construct
Section C: Perceived Organizational Technology Readiness
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Data & Analytics Readiness
Measurement Objective
Readiness: data analytics and insights capability.
Item Code / Variable Name
C14 / Ready_AnalyticsCap
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Davenport & Harris (2007)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Readiness/Capability: Very Low Readiness/Capability; Low Readiness/Capability; Moderate Readiness/Capability; High Readiness/Capability; Very High Readiness/Capability + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID217 / Q47-64_Readiness_14
Relationship to Other Items
—
C15Ordinal (Likert-type)

Maturity and efficiency of business processes potentially impacted by new technology.

Section / Primary Construct
Section C: Perceived Organizational Technology Readiness
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Process & Operational Readiness
Measurement Objective
Readiness: maturity/efficiency of business processes.
Item Code / Variable Name
C15 / Ready_ProcessMaturity
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
CMMI; Hammer & Champy (1993)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Readiness/Capability: Very Low Readiness/Capability; Low Readiness/Capability; Moderate Readiness/Capability; High Readiness/Capability; Very High Readiness/Capability + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID217 / Q47-64_Readiness_15
Relationship to Other Items
—
C16Ordinal (Likert-type)

Effectiveness of processes for monitoring technology performance and user satisfaction.

Section / Primary Construct
Section C: Perceived Organizational Technology Readiness
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Process & Operational Readiness
Measurement Objective
Readiness: effectiveness of technology performance monitoring.
Item Code / Variable Name
C16 / Ready_MonitorEffective
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
DeLone & McLean (2003); ITIL
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Readiness/Capability: Very Low Readiness/Capability; Low Readiness/Capability; Moderate Readiness/Capability; High Readiness/Capability; Very High Readiness/Capability + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID217 / Q47-64_Readiness_16
Relationship to Other Items
—
C17Ordinal (Likert-type)

Adequacy of financial budget allocated for strategic technology adoption and innovation.

Section / Primary Construct
Section C: Perceived Organizational Technology Readiness
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Financial Readiness
Measurement Objective
Readiness: adequacy of financial budget for technology adoption.
Item Code / Variable Name
C17 / Ready_FinancialBudget
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Tornatzky & Fleischer (1990); Zhu et al. (2006)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-point Readiness/Capability: Very Low Readiness/Capability; Low Readiness/Capability; Moderate Readiness/Capability; High Readiness/Capability; Very High Readiness/Capability + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID217 / Q47-64_Readiness_17
Relationship to Other Items
—
C_ACOrdinal (Likert-type)⚠ Attention Check

The extent to which assessment processes capture meaningful input (select Low Readiness/Capability for this item).

Expected answer: Low Readiness/Capability
Section / Primary Construct
Section C: Attention Check
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Data Quality Control
Measurement Objective
Attention/validity check embedded in readiness matrix (instructed-response item).
Item Code / Variable Name
C_AC / Ready_AttentionCheck
Variable Type
Ordinal (Likert-type)
Theoretical Grounding
Survey methodology best practice (IRI)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
Low Readiness/Capability
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID217 / Q47-64_Readiness_18
Relationship to Other Items
Attention check item; expected response: Low Readiness/Capability (instructed-response item)
D1Ordinal (Maturity Level)

IT Investment & Value Management: How mature is your organization's approach to selecting, managing, and realizing value from IT investments, ensuring clear alignment with strategic objectives and mission impact?

Section / Primary Construct
Section D: Perceived Maturity of Organizational Capabilities
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Financial & Value Management
Measurement Objective
Maturity of IT investment selection, management, and value realization.
Item Code / Variable Name
D1 / Maturity_ITInvestValue
Variable Type
Ordinal (Maturity Level)
Theoretical Grounding
Val IT (ISACA); GAO ITIM
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-level Maturity: Level 1: Initial/Ad Hoc; Level 2: Developing/Repeatable; Level 3: Defined/Standardized; Level 4: Managed/Quantitatively Managed; Level 5: Optimizing/Innovating + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID220 / Q65-73_Maturity_1
Relationship to Other Items
—
D2Ordinal (Maturity Level)

IT-Enabled Organizational Innovation: How mature is your organization's capability to systematically identify, explore, and leverage technology for driving organizational innovation, developing new services/products, or achieving significant operational/mission improvements?

Section / Primary Construct
Section D: Perceived Maturity of Organizational Capabilities
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Innovation & Strategic Capability
Measurement Objective
Maturity of systematic technology-driven organizational innovation.
Item Code / Variable Name
D2 / Maturity_ITInnovation
Variable Type
Ordinal (Maturity Level)
Theoretical Grounding
Christensen (1997); O'Reilly & Tushman (2004)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-level Maturity: Level 1: Initial/Ad Hoc; Level 2: Developing/Repeatable; Level 3: Defined/Standardized; Level 4: Managed/Quantitatively Managed; Level 5: Optimizing/Innovating + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID220 / Q65-73_Maturity_2
Relationship to Other Items
—
D3Ordinal (Maturity Level)

Organizational Process Management & Standardization: How mature is the consistency, standardization, effectiveness, and integration of key organizational processes (e.g., project management, service delivery, operational workflows) that are critical for technology adoption and sustained performance?

Section / Primary Construct
Section D: Perceived Maturity of Organizational Capabilities
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Process & Operational Management
Measurement Objective
Maturity of process standardization, effectiveness, and integration.
Item Code / Variable Name
D3 / Maturity_ProcessMgt
Variable Type
Ordinal (Maturity Level)
Theoretical Grounding
CMMI (SEI/ISACA); Hammer & Champy (1993)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-level Maturity: Level 1: Initial/Ad Hoc; Level 2: Developing/Repeatable; Level 3: Defined/Standardized; Level 4: Managed/Quantitatively Managed; Level 5: Optimizing/Innovating + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID220 / Q65-73_Maturity_3
Relationship to Other Items
—
D4Ordinal (Maturity Level)

Data Governance & Analytics for Decision-Making: How mature is your organization's approach to governing its data assets, ensuring data quality, and utilizing data analytics and business intelligence to inform strategic and operational decision-making and drive improvements?

Section / Primary Construct
Section D: Perceived Maturity of Organizational Capabilities
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Data & Analytics Governance
Measurement Objective
Maturity of data governance, quality, and analytics for decision-making.
Item Code / Variable Name
D4 / Maturity_DataGovAnalytics
Variable Type
Ordinal (Maturity Level)
Theoretical Grounding
DAMA-DMBOK; COBIT (ISACA)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-level Maturity: Level 1: Initial/Ad Hoc; Level 2: Developing/Repeatable; Level 3: Defined/Standardized; Level 4: Managed/Quantitatively Managed; Level 5: Optimizing/Innovating + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID220 / Q65-73_Maturity_4
Relationship to Other Items
—
D5Ordinal (Maturity Level)

Technology Risk & Resilience Management: How mature is your organization's integrated approach to identifying, assessing, proactively managing, and governing technology-related risks (including cybersecurity, data privacy, vendor risks, and operational disruptions) to ensure business resilience and compliance?

Section / Primary Construct
Section D: Perceived Maturity of Organizational Capabilities
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Risk & Resilience
Measurement Objective
Maturity of integrated technology risk identification and management.
Item Code / Variable Name
D5 / Maturity_TechRiskMgt
Variable Type
Ordinal (Maturity Level)
Theoretical Grounding
NIST CSF; ISO 31000; COBIT (ISACA)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-level Maturity: Level 1: Initial/Ad Hoc; Level 2: Developing/Repeatable; Level 3: Defined/Standardized; Level 4: Managed/Quantitatively Managed; Level 5: Optimizing/Innovating + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID220 / Q65-73_Maturity_5
Relationship to Other Items
—
D6Ordinal (Maturity Level)

Strategic IT Planning & Enterprise Architecture: How mature are the processes for developing, communicating, governing, and adapting an overall IT strategy and enterprise architecture that are dynamically aligned with and support the organization's overarching mission, goals, and evolving needs?

Section / Primary Construct
Section D: Perceived Maturity of Organizational Capabilities
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Strategy & Architecture
Measurement Objective
Maturity of IT strategic planning and enterprise architecture.
Item Code / Variable Name
D6 / Maturity_StratPlanEA
Variable Type
Ordinal (Maturity Level)
Theoretical Grounding
TOGAF; Henderson & Venkatraman (1993)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-level Maturity: Level 1: Initial/Ad Hoc; Level 2: Developing/Repeatable; Level 3: Defined/Standardized; Level 4: Managed/Quantitatively Managed; Level 5: Optimizing/Innovating + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID220 / Q65-73_Maturity_6
Relationship to Other Items
—
D7Ordinal (Maturity Level)

Workforce Capability & Talent Development: How mature is your organization's systematic approach to planning for, attracting, developing, retaining, and managing personnel with the necessary skills, competencies, and roles to effectively implement, manage, support, and leverage technology?

Section / Primary Construct
Section D: Perceived Maturity of Organizational Capabilities
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Workforce & Talent
Measurement Objective
Maturity of workforce capability planning, development, and retention.
Item Code / Variable Name
D7 / Maturity_WorkforceDev
Variable Type
Ordinal (Maturity Level)
Theoretical Grounding
OPM3 (PMI); CMMI People CMM
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-level Maturity: Level 1: Initial/Ad Hoc; Level 2: Developing/Repeatable; Level 3: Defined/Standardized; Level 4: Managed/Quantitatively Managed; Level 5: Optimizing/Innovating + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID220 / Q65-73_Maturity_7
Relationship to Other Items
—
D8Ordinal (Maturity Level)

Change Leadership & Adoption Management: How mature is your organization's capability to effectively lead and manage the complex organizational, cultural, and human aspects of change associated with significant technology adoption, digital transformation initiatives, and new ways of working?

Section / Primary Construct
Section D: Perceived Maturity of Organizational Capabilities
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Change & Adoption Leadership
Measurement Objective
Maturity of leading organizational/cultural change for technology adoption.
Item Code / Variable Name
D8 / Maturity_ChangeLead
Variable Type
Ordinal (Maturity Level)
Theoretical Grounding
Kotter (1995); Prosci ADKAR; CMMI
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
5-level Maturity: Level 1: Initial/Ad Hoc; Level 2: Developing/Repeatable; Level 3: Defined/Standardized; Level 4: Managed/Quantitatively Managed; Level 5: Optimizing/Innovating + Don't Know
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID220 / Q65-73_Maturity_8
Relationship to Other Items
—
D_ACOrdinal (Maturity Level)⚠ Attention Check

Internal Process Alignment: For this item, to confirm careful reading, please select Level 2: Developing/Repeatable.

Expected answer: Level 2: Developing/Repeatable
Section / Primary Construct
Section D: Attention Check
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Data Quality Control
Measurement Objective
Attention/validity check embedded in maturity matrix (instructed-response item).
Item Code / Variable Name
D_AC / Maturity_AttentionCheck
Variable Type
Ordinal (Maturity Level)
Theoretical Grounding
Survey methodology best practice (IRI)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
Level 2: Developing/Repeatable
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID220 / Q65-73_Maturity_9
Relationship to Other Items
Attention check item; expected response: Level 2: Developing/Repeatable (instructed-response item)
E1Open Text

Are there any other significant barriers, readiness factors, or aspects of organizational maturity related to technology adoption that you believe were not adequately covered in this survey? Please elaborate.

Section / Primary Construct
Section E: Final Thoughts & Feedback
Sub-Construct / Grouping
Open-Ended Feedback
Measurement Objective
Capture additional barriers, readiness factors, or maturity aspects not covered.
Item Code / Variable Name
E1 / Feedback_Open
Variable Type
Open Text
Theoretical Grounding
Qualitative exploratory (supplemental)
APA Citation
N/A
RIS Citation
N/A
Source Link
N/A
Scale Type / Response Options
Open-ended text response (multi-line)
Qualtrics QID / Export Tag
QID225 / Q74_Feedback
Relationship to Other Items
—