Slide 3: Voluntary vs. Involuntary User Adoption
VOLUNTARY ADOPTION
- Users choose to use the technology
- Perceived value > perceived cost/effort
- High engagement, feedback, innovation
- Self-sustaining usage patterns
- Users become advocates
INVOLUNTARY ADOPTION
- Users required to use technology (mandate, policy, no alternative)
- May lack buy-in or see value
- Resistance, workarounds, minimal compliance
- Requires sustained enforcement
- Risk of "shelf-ware" despite mandate
⚠️ AVOID INVOLUNTARY ADOPTION WHEN POSSIBLE
Visual
| Factor | Voluntary | Involuntary |
|---|---|---|
| User engagement | High | Low |
| Training effectiveness | Self-motivated | Forced compliance |
| Innovation/feedback | Active contribution | Minimal |
| Sustainability | Self-sustaining | Requires enforcement |
| Organizational risk | Lower | Higher (workarounds/resistance) |
Speaker notes
- "Involuntary adoption creates technical debt in human form"
- "Users find workarounds when forced - often less secure or efficient"
- "Design for voluntary adoption from the start"
Transition: "So why does technology end up on the shelf? Let's look at the common causes."
