Skip to main content

CRP 2026: Key Findings

Published: April 2026

All effect sizes, cross-tabulations, t-tests, and ANOVA are computed independently for each of the three CRP sample definitions. This ensures that any finding can be validated against the researcher’s chosen dataset.

Effect Sizes (Cohen’s d)

Cohen’s d measures the standardized difference between group means. Values of |d| < 0.2 are negligible, 0.2-0.5 small, 0.5-0.8 medium, and > 0.8 large. Each comparison is computed separately for each result group.

Conservative Clean (N=79)

Technical vs Non-Technical - n=18 vs n=61

ConstructTech MeanNon-Tech MeanCohen’s dSize
barriers2.74382.8346-0.14negligible
readiness3.21852.9981+0.38small
maturity3.13893.0003+0.20negligible

Large Org (5000+) vs Small/Medium - n=17 vs n=62

ConstructLarge MeanS/M MeanCohen’s dSize
barriers3.09192.7377+0.57medium
readiness3.02223.0555-0.06negligible

Flexible Clean (N=116)

Technical vs Non-Technical - n=32 vs n=84

ConstructTech MeanNon-Tech MeanCohen’s dSize
barriers2.66672.8357-0.26small
readiness3.34882.9727+0.62medium
maturity3.27342.9808+0.39small

Large Org (5000+) vs Small/Medium - n=22 vs n=94

ConstructLarge MeanS/M MeanCohen’s dSize
barriers3.21502.6894+0.83large
readiness2.88083.1223-0.39small

Prolific Accepted (N=200)

Technical vs Non-Technical - n=53 vs n=147

ConstructTech MeanNon-Tech MeanCohen’s dSize
barriers2.74162.7726-0.04negligible
readiness3.42473.0320+0.61medium
maturity3.38273.0706+0.40small

Large Org (5000+) vs Small/Medium - n=45 vs n=155

ConstructLarge MeanS/M MeanCohen’s dSize
barriers2.96302.7067+0.38small
readiness3.20823.1151+0.14negligible

Cross-Tabulations

Cross-tabulations show construct means broken down by respondent subgroups (role, org size). These are computed for each result group to check whether group-level patterns hold across data cleaning levels.

Conservative Clean (N=79)

By Role

GroupnBRM
Technical182.743.223.14
Non-Technical612.833.003.00

By Org Size

GroupnBRM
Small (<500)372.783.052.96
Medium (500-4999)252.683.062.95
Large (5000+)173.093.023.30

Flexible Clean (N=116)

By Role

GroupnBRM
Technical322.673.353.27
Non-Technical842.842.972.98

By Org Size

GroupnBRM
Small (<500)522.743.103.01
Medium (500-4999)422.633.153.13
Large (5000+)223.212.883.06

Prolific Accepted (N=200)

By Role

GroupnBRM
Technical532.743.423.38
Non-Technical1472.773.033.07

By Org Size

GroupnBRM
Small (<500)852.733.012.97
Medium (500-4999)702.683.243.24
Large (5000+)452.963.213.36

Inferential Statistics

Welch’s t-tests compare two groups (unequal variance assumed). One-way ANOVA tests whether means differ across three or more groups. All tests are two-tailed with α = 0.05. Significant results (p < 0.05) are highlighted.

Conservative Clean

Welch’s t-test: Technical vs Non-Technical(ntech=18, nnon-tech=61)

ConstructtdfpSig.
barriers-0.51126.20.613
readiness1.42928.10.164
maturity0.69826.30.491

Welch’s t-test: Large vs Small/Medium Org(nlarge=17, nsm/med=62)

ConstructtdfpSig.
barriers2.25028.30.032
readiness-0.20024.20.844
maturity1.60922.50.121

One-way ANOVA: by Role(Technical, Non-Technical)

ConstructFdfpSig.
barriers0.2851, 770.595
readiness2.0141, 770.160
maturity0.5291, 770.469

One-way ANOVA: by Organization Size(Small (<500), Medium (500-4999), Large (5000+))

ConstructFdfpSig.
barriers2.3882, 760.099
readiness0.0212, 760.979
maturity1.5702, 760.215

Flexible Clean

Welch’s t-test: Technical vs Non-Technical(ntech=32, nnon-tech=84)

ConstructtdfpSig.
barriers-1.20353.40.234
readiness3.04057.60.004
maturity1.93858.50.057

Welch’s t-test: Large vs Small/Medium Org(nlarge=22, nsm/med=94)

ConstructtdfpSig.
barriers3.87435.7<.001
readiness-1.53129.30.137
maturity-0.00327.40.998

One-way ANOVA: by Role(Technical, Non-Technical)

ConstructFdfpSig.
barriers1.5231, 1140.220
readiness9.0041, 1140.003
maturity3.6061, 1140.060

One-way ANOVA: by Organization Size(Small (<500), Medium (500-4999), Large (5000+))

ConstructFdfpSig.
barriers6.4832, 1130.002
readiness1.4012, 1130.251
maturity0.3122, 1130.733

Prolific Accepted

Welch’s t-test: Technical vs Non-Technical(ntech=53, nnon-tech=147)

ConstructtdfpSig.
barriers-0.26482.60.793
readiness3.90897.4<.001
maturity2.55494.80.012

Welch’s t-test: Large vs Small/Medium Org(nlarge=45, nsm/med=155)

ConstructtdfpSig.
barriers2.23272.20.029
readiness0.76164.40.450
maturity1.86866.20.066

One-way ANOVA: by Role(Technical, Non-Technical)

ConstructFdfpSig.
barriers0.0791, 1980.780
readiness14.3961, 198<.001
maturity6.3181, 1980.013

One-way ANOVA: by Organization Size(Small (<500), Medium (500-4999), Large (5000+))

ConstructFdfpSig.
barriers2.5542, 1970.080
readiness2.6382, 1970.074
maturity4.3852, 1970.014

Completed Analyses

The following additional analyses have been completed:

Related